HTML IMG vs ASP:IMAGE performance

I have no need to have server control over an image.
What is the best choice to use HTML img tag or asp:image for best
performance?

thanks,
Goncalo BoleoHTML controls provide slightly better performance than Web Controls, so go
with the img tag.

Here's more info:
http://SteveOrr.net/faq/3in1.aspx#HTMLvsWeb

--
I hope this helps,
Steve C. Orr, MCSD, MVP
http://SteveOrr.net

"Gonalo Bolo" <gboleo@.netcabo.pt> wrote in message
news:el6Fu7PRFHA.356@.TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
>I have no need to have server control over an image.
> What is the best choice to use HTML img tag or asp:image for best
> performance?
> thanks,
> Goncalo Boleo
If there's no need to have a server control, then just use a <img> tag (primarily
for simplicity, even though it is faster but it's negligible). If you are
using a server control there's essentially no difference between the HtmlControls
and the WebContorls.

-Brock
DevelopMentor
http://staff.develop.com/ballen

> I have no need to have server control over an image.
> What is the best choice to use HTML img tag or asp:image for best
> performance?
> thanks,
> Goncalo Boleo